31/8/11

la montagne sainte victoire Paul Cézanne





5. Paul Cezanne - Montagne Sainte-Victoire, 1887, 67 x 92 cm. The mountain is seen from a vantage point to the west of Aix, near Cézanne’s family home, with the valley of the Arc in the foreground and an aqueduct to the far right. The mountain oscillates in the afternoon heat, its rock faces registering as planes of blue and gold. In the foreground are square slices of houses and floating green fields.

Paul Cézanne

One of the most influential artists in the history of twentieth-century painting, Paul Cézanne (1839–1906) has inspired generations of modern artists. Generally categorized as a Post-Impressionist, his unique method of building form with color and his analytical approach to nature influenced the art of Cubists, Fauvists, and successive generations of avant-garde artists. Beginning to paint in 1860 in his birthplace of Aix-en-Provence and subsequently studying in Paris, Cézanne's early pictures of romantic and classical themes are imbued with dark colors and executed with an expressive brushwork in the tradition of Eugène Delacroix (1798–1863). Dramatic tonal contrasts and thick layers of pigment (often applied with a palette knife) exemplify the vigor in which Cézanne painted during the 1860s, especially apparent in the portrait series of his uncle Dominique Aubert, variously costumed as a lawyer, an artist, and a monk (53.140.1; 1993.400.1). This kind of costume piece is reminiscent of Édouard Manet's Spanish paintings of the 1860s

While the three works that Cézanne exhibited in 1874 at the first Impressionist exhibition were not fully in line with the Impressionist technique of quickly placing appliqués of pigment on the canvas, he did eventually abandon his relatively dark palette in exchange for brilliant tones and began painting out-of-doors, encouraged by the Impressionist painter Camille Pissarro (1830–1903). His Bathers (1976.201.12) of 1874–75 demonstrates a developed style and tonal scale in one of his first paintings of this theme, which recurs in his oeuvre. The landscape of Bathers has the brilliance of plein-air painting, while the figures, drawn from the artist's imagination (Cézanne rarely painted nudes from life), reconcile themselves within this setting. The complex process of drawing inspiration from these two sources, nature and memory, would occupy Cézanne in his later work. The Fisherman (Fantastic Scene) (2001.473), of about 1875, shares the same bright tones as Bathers, while its subject recalls the themes of fantasy familiar from the 1860s; it too could be the product of two polar sources.

In his still-life paintings from the mid-1870s, Cézanne abandoned his thickly encrusted surfaces and began to address technical problems of form and color by experimenting with subtly gradated tonal variations, or "constructive brushstrokes," to create dimension in his objects. Still Life with Jar, Cup, and Apples shows Cézanne's rejection of the intense contrasts of light and shadow of his earlier years in exchange for a refined system of color scales placed next to one another. The light of Impressionism resonates in this work, but signs of a revised palette are especially apparent in his muted tones. Still Life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses (51.112.1), a mature work from the early 1890s, reveals Cézanne's artistic evolution and mastery of this style of building forms completely from color and creating scenes with distorted perspectival space. The objects in this painting, such as the fruit and tablecloth, are rendered without use of light or shadow, but through extremely subtle gradations of color. In such still lifes as Dish of Apples (1997.60.1) of about 1875–77, as in his landscapes, Cézanne ignores the laws of classical perspective, allowing each object to be independent within the space of a picture while the relationship of one object to another takes precedence over traditional single-point perspective.

From 1882, Cézanne executed a substantial number of landscape pictures of his native Aix and of L'Estaque, a small fishing village near Marseille, in which he continues to concentrate on pictorial problems of creating depth. Here Cézanne used an organized system of layers to construct a series of horizontal planes, which build dimension and draw the viewer into the landscape. This technique is apparent in Mont Sainte-Victoire and the Viaduct of the Arc River Valley (29.100.64) and The Gulf of Marseille Seen from L'Estaque (29.100.67). In Gardanne (57.181), he painted the landscape with intense volumetric patterns of geometric rhythms most pronounced in the houses. This picture anticipates the Cubism of Georges Braque (1882–1963) and Pablo Picasso (1881–1973), especially Braque's impressions of L'Estaque of about 1908.

In 1890, Cézanne began a series of five pictures of Provençal peasants playing cards. Widely celebrated as among the finest figure compositions completed by the artist, The Card Players (61.101.1) demonstrates his system of color gradations to build form and create a three-dimensional quality in the figures. Continuing on this theme of the rural laborer, Seated Peasant (1997.60.2) celebrates the dignity of working-class citizens of Third Republic France (1870–1940).

In 1895, the dealer Ambroise Vollard (1867–1939) held Cézanne's first one-man exhibition at his gallery in Paris. Although the exhibition met with some skepticism, Cézanne's reputation as a great artist grew quickly, and he was discussed and promoted by a small circle of enthusiasts, including the art historian and critic Bernard Berenson (1865–1959), American painter Mary Cassatt (1844–1926), and collectors Henry Osborne Havemeyer (1848–1907) and his wife Louisine Havemeyer (1855–1929). Posthumous exhibitions at Galerie Bernheim-Jeune and the Salon d'Automne in 1907 in Paris established Cézanne's artistic legacy.

Portrait of Ginevra de' Benci



This oil on wood painting is one of Da Vinci's very early works, and is usually dated as c. 1474, a time during which Leonardo was still with Andrea Verrocchio, and had been for about eight years. It was long debated as to whether Leonardo was behind this work; acceptance came with the realisation that during the period of 1470-1480 there were no other painters capable of such an impressive painting.



The lady is normally accepted to be Ginevra de' Benci, one of the most gifted intellectuals of her time. Historians generally consider the portrait was commissioned to celebrate the occasion of her marriage on January 15th, 1474 to Luigi Niccolini. She was seventeen; he was twice her age. Marriage portraits were a common practice at the time and most Florentine portraits of women were painted for just this reason.

A number of things support this theory. On the reverse of the portrait is a heraldic motif consisting of a sprig of juniper encircled by a wreath of laurel and palm, along with the motto "Beauty adorns Virtue". The juniper plants are a symbol of chastity, highly appropriate for a marriage portrait, as well as being a pun -- in Italian -- on her name (the Italian name for juniper being ginevra).

As with all of Leonardo's portraits there are disagreements over this one and some researchers feel it may have been commissioned by Bernardo Bembo, the Venetian Ambassador to Florence from 1474--76, and again in 1478--80. Bembo and Ginevra, both married, were known to have had a platonic affair, quite an accepted convention.

Unlike Leonardo's other portraits of women, this lady looks sulky, unforgiving and haughty; this is emphasised by the slightly smaller cast of one eye, making her look withdrawn. Her left eye seems to gaze directly at us while the right looks beyond to some invisible point. Like other Florentine women of the period Ginevra has shaved off her eyebrows (this is also obvious in the Mona Lisa). Maybe her expression indicates she was not entirely happy regarding her forthcoming marriage. In later life she was to go into self-inflicted exile in an attempt to recover from a severe illness; she was also tormented by an ill-fated love affair.

The marble appearance of her complexion -- smoothed with Leonardo's own hand -- is framed by the undulating ringlets of her hair. This then contrasts beautifully with the halo of spikes from the juniper bush. Leonardo veiled the background of this portrait in a thin veil of mist known as sfumato (literal translation: "turned to vapour"); this being created with overlaid oil glazes. Though Leonardo did not create this effect he become well-known for his skillful use of it.

At some point this canvas has had as much as on one-third cut from the bottom (estimates put the amount removed at around nine centimetres). This area would have been large enough to show her hands, folded or crossed, and resting in her lap. Their loss is a great shame as no one painted hands as beautifully as Leonardo.

Luckily for art fans the loss may not be complete. The silverpoint drawing, to be found in the Royal Library at Windsor, could well be a sketch done in preparation for the Ginevra portrait. Mentally placing these fingers on the painting shows us that the fingers of her right hand would have been touching the laces of her bodice. This area of the portrait has been repainted and in normal circumstances an x-ray might well reveal the missing fingers -- if that same area had not been damaged and a new piece added. As a side note, this same hand sketch is thought to have inspired Escher's very famous hand drawing.

Mutilation and repairs aside, this portrait is the best preserved of Leonardo's early works. This was the only privately-owned painting by Leonardo. In 1967 it became the first one of his paintings to join an American museum when the National Gallery in Washington bought it for a record five million dollars.

Last Supper

Big Is It?

It's huge, really - 460 x 880 cm (15 x 29 feet). It covers an entire large wall, very unlike reproductions sized to hang neatly behind one's sofa.

Where Is It?

The original mural is on a wall of the refectory (dining hall) in the Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy.
If you'd care to see a reproduction or fifty, they're easily found. As an image, Last Supper has been put on everything from mirrors, to mouse pads, to musical pillows. If Leonardo were still around, he'd be earning billions of (insert your currency here) on licensing fees alone.

How Long Did it Take Leonardo to Paint This?

He began working on it in 1495, and finished Last Supper in 1498. This is worth noting, as Leonardo was a known procrastinator with a marked tendency to leave projects unfinished.

Why Is the Composition Remarkable?

First, because the disciples are all displaying very human, identifiable emotions. "The Last Supper" had certainly been painted before. Leonardo's version, though, was the first to depict real people acting like real people.
Secondly, and of major importance - the technical perspective in Last Supper is incredible! You can see that every single element of the painting directs one's attention straight to the midpoint of the composition, Christ's head. It's arguably the greatest example of one point perspective ever created.

What Does Last Supper Depict?

Last Supper is Leonardo's visual interpretation of an event chronicled in all four of the Gospels (books in the Christian New Testament). The evening before Christ was betrayed by one of his disciples, he gathered them together to eat, tell them he knew what was coming and wash their feet (a gesture symbolizing that all were equal under the eyes of the Lord). As they ate and drank together, Christ gave the disciples explicit instructions on how to eat and drink in the future, in remembrance of him. It was the first celebration of the Eucharist, a ritual still performed.
Specifically, Last Supper depicts the next few seconds in this story after Christ dropped the bombshell that one disciple would betray him before sunrise, and all twelve have reacted to the news with different degrees of horror, anger and shock.

Who's in It?

Looking across the picture from left to right:
  • Bartholomew, James Minor and Andrew form a group of three. All are aghast, Andrew to the point of holding his hands up in a "stop!" gesture.
  • Judas, Peter and John form the next group of three. Judas, you will note, has his face in shadow and is clutching a small bag (of silver?). Peter is visibly angry and a feminine-looking John seems about to swoon.
  • Christ is the calm in the midst of the storm.
  • Thomas, James Major and Philip are next. Thomas is clearly agitated, James Major stunned and Philip seems to be seeking clarification.
  • Matthew, Thaddeus and Simon comprise the last group of three figures. It appears that, when a situation turns ugly, Simon is the "go to" guy for explanations.

Why Is it Falling Apart?

Leonardo, always the inventor, tried using new materials for Last Supper. Instead of using tempera on wet plaster (the preferred method of fresco painting, and one which had worked successfully for centuries), he thought he'd give using dry plaster a whirl. His experiment resulted in a more varied palette, which was Leonardo's intent. What he hadn't taken into account (because, who knew?) was that this method wasn't at all durable. The painted plaster began to flake off the wall almost immediately, and people have been attempting to restore it ever since.

Why Doesn't Jesus Have Feet?

Rest assured, Leonardo intended for Christ to have feet and, in fact, painted them. Around 1650, some unnamed, woefully misguided soul - on a mission to insert another door into the refectory - apparently decided that the only logical spot for said door was smack dab in the middle of that wall. We probably shouldn't grumble and just consider ourselves lucky that he wasn't engineering windows.

I Heard This Story About Last Supper. Is it True?

Do you mean the story in which Leonardo first paints Jesus Christ, after searching many months for the perfect model? And then, years and years later, after painting all eleven other disciples, has an even more grueling search for the perfect model for Judas? And - amazingly - the same person ends up being the model for both? That story?
No, it's not true, and for so many reasons (all of which are detailed in a piece at Snopes). It's a neat bit of fiction, though, complete with a moral.

San Giovanni Battista

"San Giovanni Battista" (Saint Joseph) c.1513-15.

Madonna and Child with a Pomegranate



The workshop of a Renaissance artist was both studio and school, where apprentices were trained to paint in the style of the master. Since large commissions required the efforts of many painters, backgrounds, still-life details, and secondary figures were often painted by assistants. A master might also give lesser commissions entirely over to his assistants, simply approving the work as meeting his standard. It is often difficult to distinguish the work of the master from that of talented assistants whose individual styles were not yet fully developed.

This small devotional panel is painted in the style of Andrea del Verrocchio but is the work of one of his students, Lorenzo di Credi, who inherited the workshop when Andrea died. For inspiration Credi seems also to have looked to a fellow student—Leonardo da Vinci. This madonna is modeled after one by Leonardo; in fact, the painting was once thought to be an early work by Leonardo. But the colors differ from Leonardo’s subdued palette, and the landscape lacks his fanciful mountains. Notice, too, the Virgin's left hand, which holds a pomegranate, symbol of the Resurrection. In Leonardo's painting she holds a carnation. Credi failed to alter the position of her fingers, leaving her with an unnatural gesture unthinkable from such a keen observer of nature as Leonardo.

Madonna Litta

Madonna Litta 1481-97

The attribution of this painting to Leonardo remains controversial. It is now generally agreed that while it may have been based on designs by Leonardo, it was probably brought to completion by Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio, who was a pupil of Leonardo’s in the master’s Milanese workshop under the master’s supervision.

This small painting of the Madonna and Child was a popular image type in Italy during the 15th century and was probably intended for private devotion. The overall design with the Madonna and Child situated within a dark interior with windows providing a view of a distant mountain landscape behind is typical of earlier paintings by Leonardo, such as the Madonna and Child with a Carnation and the so-called Benois Madonna.

However, the harsh outlines of the forms and the rather formulaic landscape that lacks atmosphere indicate that the painting is not the work of Leonardo himself, but that of his assistant Boltraffio, who employed a figural type similar to that of the Christchild in other paintings.

The study of a Woman’s head almost in profile, a drawing in silverpoint on greenish prepared paper by Leonardo, probably based on a life model, seems to have been used for the modelling of the Virgin’s head, implying that Leonardo was at least involved in the initial design of the painting.

Leonardo’s Madonna dei Fusi

Leornado da Vinci spent some five years living and working in and around Arezzo and the city is proud to host his painting ‘La Madonna dei Fusi’ for five months.

The painting was commissioned in 1501 by Florimond Robertet, secretary of state to Louis XII.

The version of this painting (Buccleuch version) often regarded as the most likely to be by Leonardo is in the collection of the Duke of Buccleuch and hung in his home in Drumlanrig Castle, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland until stolen; he has said it will be returned to public display there.
History of Leonardo’s Madonna dei Fusi

The Virgin and Child with St Anne


leonardo first explored the topic of the Virgin and Child with Saint Anne around about 1498. His original sketch is now lost to us, but in the one illustrated below, commonly termed the Burlington House Cartoon, the infant Christ is shown blessing a young St. John during a meeting in the desert. This is only one of many sketches on the theme that was never translated into a painting; Leonardo was to entirely abandon these earlier ideas. Cartoons are preparatory large-scale drawings intended to be transferred to a wall or canvas during the final painting; this one was named after the British collection which once owned it. Many scholars prefer the Burlington House Cartoon to Leonardo's completed oil painting, pointing out how the face of the Madonna is much more natural and less wooden looking.

The Burlington House cartoon covers eight sheets of tinted paper and is drawn in charcoal with chalk highlights. It is one of the most important works in the National Gallery, London who keep it in a darkened room to prevent fading. When originally exhibited in Florence this cartoon received an acclaim almost comparable to that of a completed painting and it has long been considered one of Leonardo's finest works, easily on a par with the Last Supper. Though Leonardo never painted this cartoon it inspired another artist to produce the Virgin and St. Anne which is in the collection of Professor Lauritz Weibull of Lund, Switzerland.

The oil painting of the Virgin And Child With St. Anne is thought to date from 1507-1513. We owe this panel to the modesty of Filippino Lippi who turned down the commission and suggested Leonardo as, "a greater artist".

An account of the cartoon for this painting indicates it may have been modified at some stage, perhaps as an afterthought. A description of the original sketch describes St. Anne as restraining her daughter from discouraging the Child in pulling the lamb's ears. This is not what can be seen today; our view is of a rather detached watching grandmother. It is quite possible the original concept for this painting had St. Anne's hand lying on her daughter's sleeve; this could easily be cancelled out by painting the Virgin's sleeve over the top of it.

In the painting the infant is shown holding a lamb, this is symbolic of himself, as Jesus is often termed the 'lamb of God'. The angle of the lamb's head, and the tight woolly curls repeated on the head of the Child, connect the two. Continuing the idea of connections, Leonardo has positioned the two sets of arms like links in a chain. Atop the chain is St. Anne, slightly set apart in the composition by the line of the Virgin's shoulder, her downward glance and the use of darker skin tones on her face. Behind them the trees definitely belong to the earth while the mountains and lake seem almost heavenly. Though this work has been much acclaimed, it has also been much criticised due to the very artificial poses.

The five by four foot painting was commissioned by the monks of the Santissima Annunziata in Florence for their high altar. Some consider this painting to be a treasure of esoterica and occult wonders. Some are fascinated by the sight of St. Anne supporting her heavy daughter on her knee, and with no visible means of support. Others are convinced that hidden in the folds of the draping over the arms is the shape of a vulture, the head and neck can be found in the blue cloak encircling the Madonna and the bird's tail points towards the infant's mouth. Most are skeptical about this idea, though Dr. Sigmund Freud supported it and claimed that it was a repercussion of a fantasy Leonardo had when he was a child and which he noted in Codex Atlanticus:

"Among the first recollections of my childhood it seemed to me that, as I lay in my cradle, a kite came to me and opened my mouth with its tail and struck me several times with its tail between my lips. "

Freud saw this as a "passive homosexual fantasy" and thought it also accounted for the strange and bewitching smiles on the lips of many of Leonardo's subjects.

The Virgin And Child With St. Anne has been retouched, and was left unfinished with the drapery covering the Virgin's legs being little more than an outline. Why is unknown, though it may have been due to Leonardo's increasing interest in mathematics and subsequent engagement as engineer in the service of Cesare Borgia. In places the paint has been applied so thinly it is almost transparent allowing the underlying sketch to be visible. The appearance of this worsened after a 1953 cleaning of the oil on wood artwork, during which overpainting was removed and dark varnish lightened.

A close study shows the lamb has been completed by another artist so the painting may have been abandoned at a time when the lamb had still only been sketched in. The background, St Anne, the Virgin and the Child are thought to be from the hand of Leonardo himself though some doubt exists about the heads as they lack the fine texture of the Mona Lisa. Suggestions have been made that these were worked on by a pupil of Leonardo's.

At the same time this painting was in progress Leonardo was experimenting with preparations which he hoped would result in an improved varnish for his work; unfortunately these experiments were a failure. This mattered little; Leonardo still had 10 years to live, but by 1508 his career as a painter was drawing to a close and after maybe as much as ten years of intermittent work on this painting he gave up.

With Leonardo not completing Virgin and Child with St. Anne in time for the altar, Filippino Lippi decided to return to the task, working on a Deposition. He was to die before having the chance to finish his painting and it was finally completed later by Perugino.

30/8/11

Mona Lisa - leonardo da vinci



Leonardo Da Vinci's Mona Lisa is one of the most famous and most celebrated works of all time. The mastery of the painting lies in its subtle detail, including the faint smile, and Mona Lisa's distinctive gaze. The work is said to have been commissioned by a gentleman named Francesco del Giocondo, who hired Leonardo to paint a portrait of his wife, and this is why The Mona Lisa is sometimes referred to as La Gioconda. While this is a theory on the origination of the painting, scholars have disagreed throughout the ages about how factual this story really is.

The Mona Lisa, aside from being one of the most recognized works in the history of art, is also one of the most widely reproduced works ever. Of course there are numerous Da Vinci posters available, many of which are of The Mona Lisa, available in different hues and a variety of sizes, there are also many other reproductions of the work. For instance, Andy Warhol used the Mona Lisa in the creation of one of his prints, and Botero reproduced his own version of The Mona Lisa, a cartoon-like oil painting. In 1954, Salvador Dali created a self-portrait of himself as Mona Lisa.

The use of The Mona Lisa does not end there; The Mona Lisa has been the inspiration behind countless novelty items including clothing, jewelry, houseware, as well as having been used in many modern day advertisements. La Gioconda has even been reproduced topless, and the Da Vinci poster has been turned into a mockery with the Mona Lisa in possession of marijuana, and even sporting hair curlers or braces.

The list goes on and on, and it is probably safe to assume that the Da Vinci posters and the extraordinary painting will continuously be tampered with to create a new Mona Lisa time and time again.

Marian Benois leonardo da vinci

Madonna and Child with Flowers, otherwise known as the Benois Madonna, could be one of two Madonnas started by Leonardo da Vinci, as he remarked himself, in October 1478. The other one could be Madonna with the Carnation from Munich.

It is likely that the Benois Madonna was the first work painted by Leonardo independently from his master Verrocchio. There are two of Leonardo's preliminary sketches for this piece in the British Museum [1].

The composition of Madonna and Child with Flowers proved to be one of Leonardo's most popular. It was extensively copied by young painters, including Raphael, whose own version of Leonardo's design (the Madonna of the Pinks) was acquired in 2004 by the National Gallery, London.

For centuries, Madonna and Child with Flowers was considered lost. In 1909, the architect Leon Benois sensationally exhibited it in St Petersburg as part of his father-in-law's collection. The painting had been apparently brought from Italy to Russia by the notable connoisseur Alexander Korsakov in the 1790s. Upon Korsakov's death, it was sold by his son to the Astrakhan merchant Sapozhnikov for 1400 roubles and so passed by inheritance to the Benois family in 1880. After many a squabble regarding attribution, Leon Benois sold the painting to the Imperial Hermitage Museum in 1914. Since then, it has been exhibited in St Petersburg.

Leonardo da Vinci

Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519)

It may seem unusual to include Leonardo da Vinci in a list of paleontologists and evolutionary biologists. Leonardo was and is best known as an artist, the creator of such masterpieces as the Mona Lisa, Madonna of the Rocks, and The Last Supper. Yet Leonardo was far more than a great artist: he had one of the best scientific minds of his time. He made painstaking observations and carried out research in fields ranging from architecture and civil engineering to astronomy to anatomy and zoology to geography, geology and paleontology. In the words of his biographer Giorgio Vasari:
The most heavenly gifts seem to be showered on certain human beings. Sometimes supernaturally, marvelously, they all congregate in one individual. . . . This was seen and acknowledged by all men in the case of Leonardo da Vinci, who had. . . an indescribable grace in every effortless act and deed. His talent was so rare that he mastered any subject to which he turned his attention. . . . He might have been a scientist if he had not been so versatile.  Leonardo's scientific and technical observations are found in his handwritten manuscripts, of which over 4000 pages survive, including the one pictured on the right, showing some rock formations (click on it to view an enlargement). It seems that Leonardo planned to publish them as a great encyclopedia of knowledge, but like many of his projects, this one was never finished. The manuscripts are difficult to read: not only did Leonardo write in mirror-image script from right to left, but he used peculiar spellings and abbreviations, and his notes are not arranged in any logical order. After his death his notes were scattered to libraries and collections all over Europe. While portions of Leonardo's technical treatises on painting were published as early as 1651, the scope and caliber of much of his scientific work remained unknown until the 19th century. Yet his geological and paleontological observations and theories foreshadow many later breakthroughs.

Leonardo knew well the rocks and fossils (mostly Cenozoic mollusks) found in his native north Italy. No doubt he had ample opportunity to observe them during his service as an engineer and artist at the court of Lodovico Sforza, Duke of Milan, from 1482 to 1499: Vasari wrote that "Leonardo was frequently occupied in the preparation of plans to remove mountains or to pierce them with tunnels from plain to plain." He made many observations on mountains and rivers, and he grasped the principle that rocks can be formed by deposition of sediments by water, while at the same time the rivers erode rocks and carry their sediments to the sea, in a continuous grand cycle. He wrote: "The stratified stones of the mountains are all layers of clay, deposited one above the other by the various floods of the rivers. . . In every concavity at the summit of the mountains we shall always find the divisions of strata in the rocks." Leonardo appear to have grasped the law of superposition, which would later be articulated fully by the Danish scientist Nicolaus Steno in 1669: in any sequence of sedimentary rocks, the oldest rocks are those at the base. He also appears to have noticed that distinct layers of rocks and fossils could be traced over long distances, and that these layers were formed at different times: ". . . the shells in Lombardy are at four levels, and thus it is everywhere, having been made at various times." Nearly three hundred years later, the rediscovery and elaboration of these principles would make possible modern stratigraphy and geological mapping.

In Leonardo's day there were several hypotheses of how it was that shells and other living creatures were found in rocks on the tops of mountans. Some believed the shells to have been carried there by the Biblical Flood; others thought that these shells had grown in the rocks. Leonardo had no patience with either hypothesis, and refuted both using his careful observations. Concerning the second hypothesis, he wrote that "such an opinion cannot exist in a brain of much reason; because here are the years of their growth, numbered on their shells, and there are large and small ones to be seen which could not have grown without food, and could not have fed without motion -- and here they could not move." There was every sign that these shells had once been living organisms. What about the Great Flood mentioned in the Bible? Leonardo doubted the existence of a single worldwide flood, noting that there would have been no place for the water to go when it receded. He also noted that "if the shells had been carried by the muddy deluge they would have been mixed up, and separated from each other amidst the mud, and not in regular steps and layers -- as we see them now in our time." He noted that rain falling on mountains rushed downhill, not uphill, and suggested that any Great Flood would have carried fossils away from the land, not towards it. He described sessile fossils such as oysters and corals, and considered it impossible that one flood could have carried them 300 miles inland, or that they could have crawled 300 miles in the forty days and nights of the Biblical flood.

How did those shells come to lie at the tops of mountains? Leonardo's answer was remarkably close to the modern one: fossils were once-living organisms that had been buried at a time before the mountains were raised: "it must be presumed that in those places there were sea coasts, where all the shells were thrown up, broken, and divided. . ." Where there is now land, there was once ocean. It was possible, Leonardo thought, that some fossils were buried by floods -- this idea probably came from his observations of the floods of the Arno River and other rivers of north Italy -- but these floods had been repeated, local catastrophes, not a single Great Flood. To Leonardo da Vinci, as to modern paleontologists, fossils indicated the history of the Earth, which extends far beyond human records. As Leonardo himself wrote:
Since things are much more ancient than letters, it is no marvel if, in our day, no records exist of these seas having covered so many countries. . . But sufficient for us is the testimony of things created in the salt waters, and found again in high mountains far from the seas.

Portrait of Ambroise Vollard, Picasso (1910) picasso


Artist: Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) was revolutionising art when he painted this cubist portrait in 1910. Cubism was an all-out assault on habits not only of painting but of seeing. In their revolution between 1908 and the first world war, Picasso and Georges Braque, as if to provide the viewer with some sort of anchor, stuck to traditional genres - the still-life and the portrait. By starting with the assumptions of pictorial content that a portrait brings, cubist painting is all the better able to subvert them.

However, this is not a mockery of portraiture; Picasso would have said that it is a more truthful portrait. The mystery of cubist portraiture, its depiction of the self as intangible, indescribable, revives in modern art the seriousness of Rembrandt.

Subject: Ambroise Vollard (1867-1939) was one of the great art dealers of the 20th century. He championed Cézanne, Van Gogh, Renoir, Gauguin and Rousseau. He promoted Picasso's blue and rose periods, but he was careful about cubism. When Picasso later returned to a figuration informed by cubist richness and surrealist eroticism, they collaborated on one of Picasso's greatest achievements: his lubricious, mytho-erotic Vollard Suite, 100 engraved plates completed in 1937, culminating in emotional portraits of Vollard, who was to die two years later in a car crash.

Distinguishing features: His downcast eyes, apparently closed, the massive explosion of his bald head, multiplying itself up the painting like an egg being broken open, his bulbous nose and the dark triangle of his beard are the first things the eye latches on to. They are recognisable. At least that's the way your mind, through habit, composes the details into information.

But what head? What beard? Above Vollard's eyes is a broken architecture of shards of flesh- or brick-coloured painting; planes that have been started and stopped, as if in a slow-motion exaggerated cartoon of the movement a painter makes between looking up, recording on canvas the detail he sees, looking back. The process of painting reveals itself with a gross, physical explicitness, and in doing so, creates a kind of caricature; Picasso monstrously transfigures the aspect of Vollard's head, its massive dome, that most impresses him.

There is not a single aspect of his face that is "there" in any conventional pictorial sense. The more you look for a picture, the more insidiously Picasso demonstrates that life is not made of pictures but of unstable relationships between artist and model, viewer and painting, self and world. And yet this is a portrait of an individual whose presence fills the painting. Vollard is more real than his surroundings, which have disintegrated into a black and grey crystalline shroud.

As a portrait it is flattering, not least in its implication that Vollard is one of a tiny elite who understand cubism (that huge brain of his must have helped). With eyes closed like a tranquil, omnipotent god, Vollard is sublime.

Inspirations and influences: Picasso said: "The most beautiful woman who ever lived never had her portrait painted, drawn or engraved any oftener than Vollard - by Cézanne, Renoir, Rouault, Bonnard... But my cubist portrait of him is the best one of all."

Where is it? Pushkin Museum of Fine Art, Moscow.

Picasso's Portrait of Gertrude Stein


The Laundry Barge
In 1904, Picasso returned to Paris and rented a studio in an old, dilapidated building filled with artists and poets. Located at 13 Rue Ravignan, the building was dubbed the Bateau-Lavoir (or laundry barge) by poet-in-residence, Max Jacob. It is at this time that Picasso first came into contact with French painter Henri Matisse, as well as American ex-pat Gertrude Stein, who—along with her brother Leo—was one of the foremost patrons of modern art in Paris. The "Bateau-Lavoir"

Gertrude and Picasso
In 1905, at the same time that Leo Stein bought Matisse's Bonheur de Vivre, Gertrude commissioned a portrait by Picasso. The related story goes like this: Stein sat for Picasso so many times (supposedly 90 sittings) that eventually he said that he could no longer see her face when he looked at her. He then wiped out the face just before a trip to Spain.

In the autumn of 1905 after his return to Paris, Picasso painted Stein's mask-like face, which reflected his new interest in archaic Iberian sculpture that he had just seen in an exhibition at the Louvre. There is one more element to this anecdote: Stein's friends often noted that the painting didn't look like her. Picasso's response was, "it will." For her part, Stein said in later years that it was the only image of her that she thought was successful.

Self-Portrait (1907) picasso

Picasso’s revelation of himself to us shows how his upbringing and relationships led him to suppress emotions and unwanted knowledge from himself subconciously. As Gedo said, Picasso was “veiling the confessional aspects of his painting.” (Gedo, 80) Although Picasso had no yet found what he was “veiling”, he could not find it himself because of his need to put negative memories in the past. Picasso did not realize that this is what he needed to help him put together what made him human, and his attempts were futile.
In a final attempt to find himself, and in the era of Cubism, Picasso painted his eyes with the most definition in Self-Portrait (1907). With his eyes the darkest, most defined, and largest they had ever been, he was more blind than ever about how to go about finding himself, and exactly what components made up his personality. In this typically Cubist painting, there was no doubt that Picasso believed he had finally succeeded in discovering who he truly was. While some people were opposed to his new style, there were many who praised him. In Self-Portrait (1907), Picasso’s eyes are large and set, making his “face…severe and masklike.” (Wertenbaker, 53) This feature of a “mask” of ego hides Picasso from himself, and although his eyes are large, everything else is covered. Picasso tried to go back to the basics of artistic technique in this last desperate attempt to discvoer himself. As Wertenbaker says, there are “characteristics of primitive art in his portrayals of the human face and figure.” (Wertenbaker, 53) However, these “primitive” characteristics do not help Picasso remove everything that is clouding his view of himself. They merely help us see all the more clearly why Picasso will always be blinded by his ego. His over-confidence and beleif that he is the only success in his field will always blind him from seeing the truth about himself and his shattered personality.
Picasso, Pablo. Self-portrait (1907) National Gallery, Prague, Czech Republic.

Self-Portrait with Palette (1906) picasso


Self-Portrait with Palette, 1906

Picasso's preparatory drawings for this striking self-portrait of 1906 indicate that the composition went through considerable transformation. At one point, Picasso considered portraying himself in the act of painting, his gaze focused on touching brush to palette. But the final painting shows the artist staring outward, holding only a palette, his right hand clenched in a fist. Even more than the crude shirt he wears, it is the artist's broad, sharply chiseled face that conveys an impression of raw creativity. The stylized facial features, especially the large almond-shaped eyes, derive from Picasso's recent study of ancient sculpture from the Iberian Peninsula-now occupied by Spain and Portugal.

Yo Picasso (1901) picasso

The great Spanish painter Pablo Picasso created his self portrait Yo, Picasso in 1901. The painting is a description of the artist's self features created brilliantly in different poses.
Pablo Picasso:

Pablo Ruiz Picasso was a great Spanish painter and sculptor. Picasso was one of the famous art figures of 20th century. Pablo Picasso's artworks are divided according to the periods (mentioned below) of which they are influenced.


  • The Blue Period (1901-1904) most famous period

  • Rose Period (1905-1907)

  • The African-influenced Period (1908-1909)

  • Analytic Cubism (1909-1912) and

  • Synthetic Cubism (1912-1919)


    Yo, Picasso, Description:

    Yo, Picasso is a translated version of "I Picasso". Pablo Picasso created Yo, Picasso in the year 1901; the same year when he was suffering with the shock of death of his close friend, Carlos Casagemas. Picasso created two different versions of this painting as "Yo Picasso" and "Yo." The title of the painting clearly reveals Picasso's agitated mental condition and how self conscious Picasso had become during that miserable period of his life.

    In the painting Picasso is depicted looking in a sideways glance. Critics analyze that a look on the painting clears out the egoist expression in Picasso's eyes. According to Daix the expression in Picasso's eyes is really extraordinary. "Yo Picasso" has a slightly smiling expression. It shows Picasso with a brilliant facial expression making him appear twenty years old. This was Picasso's own vision about himself. He had painted it during his famous Blue Period. Still, the "portrait" of "Yo Picasso" reveals the truth for a viewer who is determining Picasso's inner soul, but at the same time it proves a failure for Picasso himself discovering the truth of his own existence.

    Yo, Picasso, Auction:

    Yo, Picasso was one of most expensive paintings by Picasso. The painting which was created in 1901 was auctioned in the year 1989 by Wendell Cherry in Sotheby's New York. Stavros Niarchos paid a huge amount of $79.3 millions for that painting.

  • The Old Guitarist Pablo Picasso


    The Old Guitarist
    Pablo Picasso
    Oil On Panel, 1903

    When the subject of monochromatic color schemes comes up, I think of Picasso and his “Blue Period”. I also think of this particlular painting, a prime example of that period, as it has been a great favorite of mine since I was a child.

    Many years ago, I visited the Art Institute in Chicago and for some reason, the fact that this painting is in residence there had slipped my mind. I came around a corner and there it was! It’s a good thing there happened to be a bench right in front of it, because its power literally knocked me off my feet. I still get a shiver just thinking about it.

    Pablo Picasso’s father was an art instructor, so he was trained as an artist as a very young man. Having outgrown his possibilities in Madrid (Spain) by the age of 19, he went to live in Paris where he was a small fish in a larger pond and had to struggle to figure where he fit into the society of artists there. Because he identified with those living on the fringes of society, he began to paint pictures of the downtrodden, depicting them in all of their misery, using a muted palette of blue - the color of melancholy. His sadness during this period was intensified by the suicide of a young friend. This became known as his “Blue Period” (1901-1904), one of two very prolific periods that were preambles to “Cubism”. Les miserables of the Blue Period gave way to the the clowns and other circus figures of the “Rose Period” (1904-1906), a much more cheerful body of work over all. After that, beginning with his experiments in Cubism, Picasso became a power to be reckoned with in the world of modern art and continued to be an innovator of the highest order for the rest of his life. This will not be the last we hear of him in our “Legacy” section. And, whenever I think of this painting, it reminds me of a favorite poem that seems to go with it so well.

    Some have said that Wallace Stevens wrote “The Man With the Blue Guitar” after viewing Picasso’s “Old Guitarist” and it certainly seems as if it could be so.

    I reprint the whole text of the poem here although, honestly, I find it a bit disconcerting and difficult to stay with (it’s ok to admit these things). But the first six lines, which I highlighted with bold blue type, say it all, in my opinion. I have framed them on my studio wall to remind me that it is not always necessary to go by the book - that my art is my “blue guitar”, and through it, I can redefine my world to match my fancy.

    Picasso’s Still Life with Chair Caning, 1912 (Musee Picasso, Paris)


    My fortune cookie today was uncanny, “Old associates lead to new adventures.” It was discarded after a lunch celebrating a terrific collaborative effort between myself, Eric Feinblatt and Beth Harris. We met together just an hour or so prior to our scheduled presentation in FIT’s CET (Center for Excellence in Teaching – our technology lab for faculty development). We were scheduled to discuss uses of multimedia in teaching and we were prepared to discuss exploratory work we had done using a variety of tools in the context of our own courses. These tools include Flickr, podcasting (using Audacity), and some preliminary work done with Camtasia. But Beth, in a flash of brilliance, suggested that we combine Camtasia with ARTstor’s OIV (offline image viewer) to move beyond the podcasts we’d already created at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for our online courses. We quickly settled on Picasso’s Still Life with Chair Caning as our initial victim. This, because I will soon be covering it in my online course, and I have found this collage especially difficult to adequately convey to my students. In our podcasts, Beth and I had stood before a painting in the museum, IPod with mic attachment in hand, and offered our students a spontaneous conversation about the work of art. What resulted was an unscripted discussion with a wonderful sense of discovery as each of us prompted the other to look anew.

    So the three of us sat down and we were now able to go significantly further than we’d been able to in the museum. Thanks to the OIV, some forethought, and Google, we were able to significantly reinforce our discussion with collateral images. Further we were able to zoom in and record our mouse movements–used largely as a pointer. This is an important advantage over simply placing descriptive text near the image and hoping the student can connect the two. The result, like with the podcasts, was an easy give and take that was meant to model for our students, the ways they might begin to freely explore works of art.

    As the three of us went to lunch after the presentation, we mused that if we created a Camtasia file with subsidiary documentary material, our students or anyone with a video IPod could stand in front of a painting in a museum and not only hear our analysis but also see sketches, variations and other supporting materials, truly creating a classroom without walls.

    femme assise dans un jardin picasso

    A painting is an art of creating illustration of different types. The concept of painting is not new in fact it has emerged since the ancient cave paintings. The oldest known paintings are at the Grotte Chauvet in France, claimed by some historians to be about 32,000 years old. Such paintings were engraved and painted using red ochre. The images of show horses, rhinoceros, lions, buffalo, mammoth or humans were often painted in hunting activities. cave paintings were created all over the world including France, Spain, Portugal, China, Australia, India and many other countries of the world. Painting grew slowly in different forms while previously only charcoals and other such things were used for creating a sketch. With the introduction of colors great changes have come in painting forms. Many paintings were created from time to time by many famous artists Femme assise dans un jardin is one such painting created by Pablo Picasso in 1938.


    The Painting (Femme Assise Dans Un Jardin):

    Femme assise dans un jardin is an exotic painting created by Pablo Picasso in 1938 on a canvas sized 131 X 97 cm. Like other paintings this extensive oil painting work became popular worldwide. The painting depicts a female figure.

    The Artist (Pablo Picasso):

    Pablo Picasso was a famous Spanish artist. Throughout his art life he did many paintings and made mark in the world of art. One such painting is Femme assise dans un jardin. Picasso's full name was Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso. Picasso was one of the famous art figures in 20th century art. Generally Picasso's artworks are divided into different periods. The most famous period of his work is the Blue period (1901-1904), the Rose Period (1905-1907), the African-influenced Period (1908-1909), Analytic Cubism (1909-1912), and Synthetic Cubism (1912-1919).

    Femme Assise Dans Un Jardin Auction:

    Femme assise dans un jardin created by Pablo Picasso in 1938 went for auction in 1999. The painting was auctioned by Robert Saidenberg in Sotheby's, New York. The painting was sold for $49,502,500.

    Les Noces de Pierrette picasso

    One of the most important 20th century art personality Pablo Picasso created Les Noces de Pierrette in 1905. Picasso created many expensive paintings Les Noces de Pierrette is one such masterpiece.
    Pablo Picasso, the Artist:

    Picasso was an important Spanish painter and sculptor in the 20th century art era. The Spanish artist has a rather long name as Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso. Picasso studied art in Madrid. Picasso's artworks are usually classified into different periods. Picasso never followed the traditional art style. He always wanted to create something new. Hence, in 1950 changing his art style once again he reinterpreted many great masters' artworks such as on Velazquez's painting of Las Meninas. Picasso created a series of works. He also created some work based on the paintings of Goya, Poussin, Manet, Courbet and Delacroix.


    Les Noces De Pierrette, Description:

    The Les Noces De Pierrette was created in 1905. The painting clearly reveals the impact of Picasso's Blue Period as it was created between 1901 and 1904. It is a very somber painting created brilliantly, applying shades of blue and green, reflecting the somber mood. Picasso created the painting during the most critical period of his life; when he was suffering of continuous depression from the death of his dear friend Carlos Casagemas. The brilliant painting is the last in the list of Picasso's Japanese themed paintings. The painting is considered as a blue period masterpiece. No doubt the painting is a great artwork and masterpiece in all respects. The painting perfectly combines all the magic, mystery and melancholy of Picasso's Blue period.

    Les Noces De Pierrette, Auction:

    Les Noces De Pierrette was auctioned on 30th November, 1989 at Binoche et Godeau in Paris, France. It was sold to an Asian businessman for a huge amount of $51,670,000 setting a record of being one of the most expensive paintings of world.

    Femme aux Bras Croises picasso


    Femme aux Bras Croisés was created by Pablo Picasso in 1902. This painting was created in the most famous Blue period, a major stage in the painting career of Picasso.
     
    Femme aux Bras Croisés, Analysis:

    One of the famous art figures in the 20th century art era, Pablo Picasso was born in Spain and was a great child prodigy. Picasso's artworks are often categorized in different periods including Blue period, Rose period, Analytic Cubism, and Synthetic Cubism. During his long art life Picasso gave expression to many of his finest creations. One such creation is the famous painting of Femme aux Bras Croisés, painted in 1901. The brilliant artwork formed a major part of Picasso's famous Blue Period; A dark, sad time in the artist's life. In Femme aux Bras Croisés, Picasso has portrayed Marie-Therese Walter on a canvas of dimension 60 cm x 81 cm.



    The beautiful painting falls in the blue period of Picasso when Picasso used to create characteristically all his paintings by combining many different tones of blue. In this beautiful oil painting Femme aux Bras Croisés, Picasso portrayed a woman believed to be Marie-Thérèse Walter sitting with her arms crossed and staring at the endless nothing, at a void. Picasso started exploring his particular work in 1901 and came to an end in 1902. Femme aux Bras Croisés was an oil work on a lithographic background. Many of Picasso's creations are regarded most expensive. Similarly, Femme aux Bras Croisés is also one of most expensive paintings created by Picasso. Because of its excellent combination of colors and idea the painting attracted many potential buyers.

    Femme aux Bras Croisés, Auction:

    One of the most expensive paintings, Femme aux Bras Croisés, was auctioned in the year 2000. Just after its creation the painting was bought by Gertrude Stein from Picasso. Later on, the painting was taken over by McCormick family who organized an auction at Christie's Rockefeller in New York City and sold Femme aux Bras Croisés for $55,000,000 on November 8, 2000. The price of the painting made it as one of the most expensive paintings ever sold in an auction.

    Rideau, Cruchon et Compotie picasso



    Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier was created about 1893 to 1894 by French artist Paul Cezanne. The painting is considered as the most expensive painting based on still life theme.

    Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier Analysis:

    Paul Cezanne was a great post impressionist French artist. It is believed that Cezanne's artworks laid the foundation of the alteration to move from the 19th century traditional art world to 20th century new style of work. Thus, Cezanne formed a bridge between the late 19th century Impressionism and the early 20th century's new artistic world, Cubism. In all his artworks Cezanne establishes his great command over color, design, composition and draftsmanship of art.



    One special characteristic of Paul Cezanne is that he is an expert in using rhythmic, susceptible and exploratory brushstrokes in all his artworks. Another common trait is the artist's excellence in using small brushstrokes and simple colors. Cezanne's paintings reveal the artist's nature of thoroughly studying a subject before actually portraying it. Paul Cezanne was especially popular for drawing still lifes. One such still life work is Rideau Cruchon ET Compotier created by Paul Cezanne in about 1893 to 1894. Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier is considered as the most expensive painting based on still life theme ever sold in an auction. This painting of Cezanne expresses the complex emotions of the artists even being based upon core realities of life. Such paintings are said to lead the creation of new art styles during 20th century like the Cubism of Picasso.

    Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier Auction:

    This expensive painting has a long history of moving through hands of different potential art lovers such as Paris dealer Cornelis Hoogendijk, Ambroise Vollard, Dr Albert C. Barnes, Paul Rosenberg, and the Carroll Carstairs Gallery. Finally on May 10 1999, at Sotheby's, New York Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier was sold in an auction for $60,502,500, establishing a record of first still life painting to be sold for such a high amount. However, later on the painting was resold at a loss.

    portrait de l'artiste sans barbe picasso

    7. Portrait de l'Artiste sans Barbe by Vincent van Gogh ($71,500,000)

    Portrait de l'artiste sans barbe ("Self-portrait without beard") is one of many self-portraits by Dutch painter Vincent van Gogh. He painted this one in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France in September 1889. The painting is a oil painting on canvas and is 40 cm x 31 cm (16" x 13").

    This is an uncommon painting since his other self-portraits show him with a beard. The self-portrait became one of the most expensive paintings of all time when it was sold for $71.5 million in 1998 in New York

    The Massacre of the Innocents picasso


    The Massacre of the Innocents is an episode of infanticide by the King of Judea, Herod the Great, that appears in the Gospel of Matthew Matthew 2:16-18. The author, traditionally Matthew the Evangelist, reports that Herod ordered the execution of all young male children in the village of Bethlehem, so as to avoid the loss of his throne to a newborn King of the Jews whose birth had been announced to him by the Magi. The incident, like others in Matthew, is described as the fulfillment of a passage in the Old Testament read as prophecy, in this case a reading of Jeremiah: "Then was fulfilled that which was spoken through Jeremiah the prophet, saying, A voice was heard in Ramah, Weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children."
    The infants, known in the Church as the Holy Innocents, have been claimed as the first Christian martyrs. Traditional accounts number them at more than ten thousand, but more conservative estimates put their number in the low dozens.. Modern biographers of Herod mostly deny the event took place.

    Au Moulin de la Galette


    Renoir delighted in `the people's Paris', of which the Moulin de la Galette near the top of Montmartre was a characteristic place of entertainment, and his picture of the Sunday afternoon dance in its acacia-shaded courtyard is one of his happiest compositions. In still-rural Montmartre, the Moulin, called `de la Galette' from the pancake which was its speciality, had a local clientèle, especially of working girls and their young men together with a sprinkling of artists who, as Renoir did, enjoyed the spectacle and also found unprofessional models. The dapple of light is an Impressionist feature but Renoir after his bout of plein-air landscape at Argenteuil seems especially to have welcomed the opportunity to make human beings, and especially women, the main components of picture. As Manet had done in La Musique aux Tuileries he introduced a number of portraits.
    The girl in the striped dress in the middle foreground (as charming of any of Watteau's court ladies) was said to be Estelle, the sister of Renoir's model, Jeanne. Another of Renoir's models, Margot, is seen to the left dancing with the Cuban painter, Cardenas. At the foreground table at the right are the artist's friends, Frank Lamy, Norbert Goeneutte and Georges Rivière who in the short-lived publication L'Impressionniste extolled the Moulin de la Galette as a page of history, a precious monument of Parisian life depicted with rigorous exactness. Nobody before him had thought of capturing some aspect of daily life in a canvas of such large dimensions.
    Renoir painted two other versions of the subject, a small sketch now in the Ordrupgard Museum, near Copenhagen and a painting smaller than the Louvre version in the John Hay Whitney collection. It is a matter of some doubt whether the latter or the Louvre version was painted on the spot. Rivière refers to a large canvas being transported to the scene though it would seem obvious that so complete a work as the picture in the Louvre would in any case have been finished in the studio.

    Portrait du Dr. Gache picasso

     
    Portrait of Dr. Gachet is one of the most revered paintings by Dutch artist Vincent van Gogh. It depicts Dr. Paul Gachet, who took care of him during the final months of his life. It was the only portrait painted by van Gogh during his stay at the doctor's home in Auvers-sur-Oise (27.2 km outside Paris), a 70 day period from May to July 1890. In 1990, it fetched a then-record price of $82.5 million ($75 million, plus a 10 percent buyer's commission) when sold at auction in New York.
    There are two authenticated versions of the portrait, both painted in June 1890 at Auvers. Both show Doctor Gachet sitting at a table and leaning his head onto his right arm, but they are easily differentiated in color and style.
    In 1890, Van Gogh's brother Theo was searching for a home for the artist upon his release from the hospital at Saint-Rémy. Upon the recommendation of Camille Pissarro, former patient of the doctor who told Theo of Gachet's interests in working with artists, Theo sent Vincent to Gachet's second home in Auvers.
    Vincent Van Gogh's impression of Gachet at times was unfavorable, writing to Theo: "I think that we must not count on Dr. Gachet at all. First of all, he is sicker than I am, I think, or shall we say just as much, so that's that. Now when one blind man leads another blind man, don't they both fall into the ditch?"[3] However, a letter dated two days later to their sister Wilhelmina, he relayed, "I have found a true friend in Dr. Gachet, something like another brother, so much do we resemble each other physically and also mentally." It is perhaps with this affection van Gogh decided to paint his doctor's portrait.

    Van Gogh's thoughts returned several times to the painting by Eugène Delacroix of Torquato Tasso in the madhouse. After a visit with Paul Gauguin to Montpellier to see Alfred Bruyas's collection in the Musée Fabre, Van Gogh wrote to Theo, asking if he could find a copy of the lithograph after the painting. Three and a half months earlier, he had been thinking of the painting as an example of the sort of portraits he wanted to paint: "But it would be more in harmony with what Eugène Delacroix attempted and brought off in his Tasso in Prison, and many other pictures, representing a real man. Ah! portraiture, portraiture with the thought, the soul of the model in it, that is what I think must come."
    Van Gogh wrote to his brother in 1890 about the painting:
    “     I've done the portrait of M. Gachet with a melancholy expression, which might well seem like a grimace to those who see it... Sad but gentle, yet clear and intelligent, that is how many portraits ought to be done... There are modern heads that may be looked at for a long time, and that may perhaps be looked back on with longing a hundred years later.

    Boy with a Pipe Picasso

     This paintings was painted in 1907. It was called the most innovative painting since the work of Giotto, when Les Demoiselles d'Avignon first appeared it was as if the art world had collapsed. Known form and respresnetation were completely abandon. The reductionism and contortion of space in the painiting was incredible, and dislocation of faces explosive. Like any revolution, the shock waves reverbetrated and the inevitable outcome was Cubism.

    This large work, which took nine months to complete, exposes the true genius and novelty of Picasso's passion. Suddenly he found freedom of expression away from current and classical French influences and was able to carve his own path.

    Picasso created hundreds of sketches and studies in preparation for the final work. It was painted in Paris during the summer of 1907. Demoiselles was revolutionary and controversial, and led to anger and disagreement amongst his closest associates and friends. Picasso long acknowledged the importance of Spanish art and Iberian sculpture as influences on the painting. Demoiselles is believed by critics to be influenced by African tribal masks and the art of Oceania, although Picasso denied the connection; many art historians remain skeptical about his denials. Several experts maintain that, at the very least, Picasso visited the Musée d'Ethnographie du Trocadéro in the spring of 1907 where he saw and was unconsciously influenced by African and Tribal art several months before completing Demoiselles. Some critics argue that the painting was a reaction to Henri Matisse's Le bonheur de vivre and Blue Nude.

    Picasso drew each figure differently. The woman pulling the curtain on the far right has heavy paint application throughout. Her head is the most cubist of all five, featuring sharp geometric shapes. The cubist head of the crouching figure underwent at least two revisions from an Iberian figure to its current state.

    Much of the critical debate that has taken place over the years centers on attempting to account for this multiplicity of styles within the work. The dominant understanding for over five decades, espoused most notably by Alfred Barr, the first director of the Museum of Modern Art in New York City and organizer of major career retrospectives for the artist, has been that it can be interpreted as evidence of a transitional period in Picasso's art, an effort to connect his earlier work to Cubism, the style he would help invent and develop over the next five or six years.

    The Museum of Modern Art in New York City mounted an important Picasso exhibition on November 15, 1939 that remained on view until January 7, 1940. The exhibition entitled: Picasso:40 Years of His Art, was organized by Alfred H. Barr (1902–1981), in collaboration with the Art Institute of Chicago. The exhibition contained 344 works, including the major and then newly painted Guernica and its studies, as well as Les Demoiselles.

    Maya with Doll


    Maya with Doll (Maya a la Poupee) is an oil painting by Pablo Picasso. Created in 1938, the New York Times described it as "a colorful Cubist portrait of Picasso’s daughter as a child clutching a doll."
     2007 theft and recovery

    On February 28, 2007, the painting was one of two stolen from the home of Picasso's granddaughter Diana Widmaier-Picasso.  The other was a 1961 painting of his second wife, titled Jacqueline.

    On August 7, 2007, French officials announced that the painting had been recovered, along with the other stolen painting, "Jacqueline". The paintings were found in Paris and the thieves, who were known to the police for previous cases of art theft, were arrested.

    Guernica Picasso

    In 1937 the Spain was at war; a civil war between the Republic Government and Francisco Franco’s Francoist army. Franco led a rebellion army to overturn the government and bring communism to the Spanish people. The Francoist army had the support of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. On April 26, 1937, 24 planes bombed the Basque town of Guernica. The town held no military significants, the objective; to send a message.

    This tragedy effected many people including Picasso, and with a commissioning by the Spanish Republican government, Picasso set to work on a mural which would become his most famous piece of work. The painting, Guernica, broke Picasso out of a creative drought and renewed a passion, but now he did not want to be known as an icon breaker. Now, he set to work to create an icon.
    The painting was 11 x 25.6 feet reflects the devastating effect of the bombing.   while early sketches showed images of hope and optimism, this faded and we are left with this powerful painting. We can pull a lot of meaning from this painting and many spend time analysing it. Like the ever-seeing eye; the focus of everyone’s gaze and could be a symbol of evil or the bombers, the light bulb in the eye symbolising the devastating effect of technology or maybe it’s there because the Spanish word for light bulb is “bombilla”, which makes an allusion to “bomb”. Some symbols in the painting may be easier to recognise, like the open palm of the dead soldier is a stigmata, a symbol of martyrdom. No matter what you see in the painting, it truly is a masterpiece that stirs up a lot of emotion.
    I would love to hear what you see and think of the painting but I would like to leave you with a story I’ve heard about Picasso, the painting, during World War 2.
    During the 1940’s Picasso’s studio on the rue des Grands-Augustins was often visited by German officers. On one of their raids a Gestapo officer found a postcard of “Guernica,” Picasso’s 1937 lament for the Basque town bombed by the Luftwaffe.
    “Did you do this?” asked the German.
    “No, you did!” replied Picasso.  “Take it? Souvenir”

    Buste de Françoise

     Lot Description

    Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
    Buste de Françoise
    oil on board
    39¼ x 31¾ in. (99.6 x 80.6 cm.)
    Painted in 1946

    Special Notice

    VAT rate of 5% is payable on hammer price and at 20% on the buyer's premium.

    Provenance

    Maya Widmaier-Picasso, Paris.
    Acquired by the late Ernst Beyeler, Basel, by 1997.
    Saleroom Notice
    Claude Picasso has confirmed the authenticity of this work.
    Pre-Lot Text
    PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATE OF ERNST BEYELER
    Literature
    The Picasso Project, ed., Picasso's Paintings, Watercolors, Drawings and Sculpture: Liberation and Post-War Years, 1944-1949, San Francisco, 2000, no. 46-059c, p. 78 (illustrated).
    Exhibited
    New York, Museum of Modern Art, Picasso and Portraiture, April - September 1996, p. 425 (illustrated); this exhibition later travelled to Paris, Grand Palais, October 1996 - January 1997.
    Saarbrücken, Saarlandmuseum, Pablo Picasso - die Malerei de fünfziger Jahre, November 2007 - February 2008.

    Lot Notes

    During the mid-1940s, while Paris was still under the burden of the Occupation, Pablo Picasso began a relationship with a young woman, Françoise Gilot, an artist in her own right. This would bring about an incredible, joyous liberation in his work. Painted in 1946, just after the end of the Second World War, Buste de Françoise is filled with a sense of celebration. The intense, rich colours and the sensuous flowing curves with which Picasso has so caressingly depicted Françoise's body and face speak of new-found freedoms, both with her and with the world at large. After the austerity of so much of Picasso's wartime output, for instance his melancholy, angular still life compositions and his tormented images of his lover Dora Maar, the lyrical, sensual form of Françoise made a bright, marked contrast. Looking at Buste de Françoise, the precedent of Marie-Thérèse Walter comes to mind, as the arcing forms which delineate Picasso's lover's body have been rendered with a similar sense of visual poetry. The intense palette and looping forms recall, say, Le rêve, Picasso's iconic image of Marie-Thérèse from just over a decade earlier. This is an effect that is heightened by his stained glass-like use of outlines to thrust the colour fields into more intense relief. However, where Marie-Thérèse was often shown asleep, Françoise has about her an intense vitality that is increased by Picasso's focus on her direct gaze, captured through the blue and red dots of her pupils.

    Picasso had met Françoise several years before the present work was painted, when she had been eating with a friend and another mutual acquaintance in a restaurant in Paris. Picasso, who had been dining with Dora Maar, had clearly been intrigued by the two young women sitting with his friend and engineered an introduction. When he asked about them, and the two girls explained that they were artists, Picasso replied: 'Well... I'm a painter too. You must come to my studio and see some of my paintings' (F. Gilot & C. Lake, Life with Picasso, New York, Toronto & London, 1964, p. 15). Françoise became a frequent visitor to Picasso's studio on the rue des Grands-Augustins, and soon was the artist's lover.

    With its green hair and blue face, Buste de Françoise clearly relates to an episode that was to have a huge impact on Françoise. It was in 1946, while she and Picasso were in the South of France, that the Spanish painter suggested that they make a trip to visit his friend Henri Matisse, who was living nearby. Françoise, a painter in her own right, who loved Matisse's work, jumped at the chance; while there, she bore witness to the conversations of these two titans of twentieth century painting and recorded them in some of her books in later years. One of the exchanges that would come to have an impact on Françoise's life occurred when Matisse began to say that he liked the idea of painting her portrait: 'He at once stated that he might very well make a portrait of me, in which my hair would be olive green, my complexion light blue, and in which of course he would not forget the angle of my eyebrows in relation to my nose' (F. Gilot, Matisse and Picasso: A Friendship in Art, London, 1990, p. 23). Elsewhere, she recalled the exchange between Matisse and Picasso. Once Matisse had explained that, 'if I made a portrait of Françoise, I would make her hair green,' Picasso retorted:

    '"But why would you make a portrait of her?"
    '"Because she has a head that interests me," Matisse said, "with her eyebrows sticking up like circumflex accents."
    '[...] Up to that time Pablo had painted only two small gray-and-white portraits of me, but when he got back into the car, all of a sudden a proprietary instinct took possession of him.
    '"Really, that's going pretty far," he said. "Do I make portraits of Lydia?' I said I didn't see any connection between the two things. "In any case," he said, "now I know how I should make your portrait"' (Gilot & Lake, op. cit., 1964, pp. 99-100).

    Picasso's jealousy of Matisse's suggestion, which itself reflects the proprietary nature of his portraits of the women in his life, resulted in his asking Françoise to move in with him shortly afterwards. This would be the beginning of a relationship which lasted into the 1950s and which also resulted in the birth of two of Picasso's children, Paloma and Claude.

    From an artistic point of view, Matisse's suggestion that he paint Françoise, a suggestion to which she doubtless would not have objected, resulted instead in a flurry of activity by Picasso. He began to look at her anew, creating a string of portraits. Some of these were works on paper in which he focussed entirely on her face, filled with the bloom of youth and her wide eyes; in others, he found that her breasts and entire air of fecundity pushed him towards depicting her as a flower, the Femme-fleur which features in two portraits painted only a little over a month before Buste de Françoise.

    When Picasso first observed his Femme-fleur rendering of Françoise, the rivalry that had helped to inspire the picture was clear, as he immediately declared, 'Matisse isn't the only one who can paint you with green hair' (Gilot & Lake, op.cit., 1964, p. 117). Although painted over a month after the Femme-fleur, looking at Buste de Françoise, the traces of her alter ego are clear. Picasso has shown her with the green hair which recalls foliage; indeed, the other colours are likewise reminiscent of flowers. At the same time, Picasso has depicted Françoise with an exaggeratedly slender waist, underscoring his own appreciation of her curvaceous figure and lending extra emphasis to her fulsome breasts while also reviving that concept of her body as a stem, as was the case in the Femme-fleur. Like those earlier pictures, Picasso has also placed a great focus on Françoise's facial features. While they are here presented as more angular than some of the earlier portraits, they nonetheless reveal an almost codified system of representation. The face appears to have been shown in a post-Cubist manner as though seen from several angles - the ears are shown at each end of the elliptical head which appears to have been unfolded, becoming two profiles. The eyes, nose, mouth and chin have become ciphers on the arena of her face, recalling ancient Egyptian art and indeed the 'Eye of Horus' amulets which would later reverberate through Picasso's portraits of his second wife, Jacqueline.

    Looking at Buste de Françoise, it also becomes apparent that Matisse's words were still on Picasso's mind, as he has indeed rendered her with 'olive green' hair and 'light blue' complexion. In a way, both the sense of celebratory sensuality and the ardent, vivid palette of Buste de Françoise can be seen to echo Matisse's works, for instance his celebrated (though then scandalous) 1905 portrait of his wife, nick named La raie verte because of the bold green area that depicted a shadow on her face. It also relates to Matisse's more recent works such as Asia, a boldly-coloured image of erotic languor and glamour painted the same year as Buste de Françoise and now in the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth.

    Matisse and Picasso had been regarded as rivals for much of their lives and careers, even in the first decades of the twentieth century. Later, this rivalry evolved into friendship. Amazingly, Picasso, who seldom paid glowing tribute to his contemporaries, admitted that, 'No one has ever looked at Matisse's painting more carefully than I; and no one has looked at mine more carefully than he' (Picasso, quoted in J. Golding, 'Introduction', pp. 13-24, Cowling et al., ed., Matisse Picasso, exh. cat., London, 2002, p. 13). Likewise, Matisse was candid when he said, 'Only one person has the right to criticise me: Picasso' (Matisse, quoted ibid., p. 24). It was during the period that Picasso was with Françoise that he and Matisse became closer. The shift in their relationship was eagerly documented by Françoise, an enthusiastic witness to their conversations. The esteem in which each artist held the other was vast, although this did not stop them sometimes needling each other, as may well have been the case when Matisse voiced his interest in painting Françoise. Yet it is clearly in part as a tribute to the older artist that he created Buste de Françoise, taking his rival's description as a list of constituent parts which he himself has co-opted in his own style to create something that, while perhaps inspired by Matisse, is nonetheless definitively Picasso.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------